📘
Whitepaper
Twitter
  • 👋Introduction
    • Enhancing Blockchain Contract Security: A Machine Learning Approach to Opcode Analysis by Neurablock
    • The importance of opcode analysis in contract security
    • Overview of the proposed system and its significance in the blockchain domain
  • ⚙️System Architecture
    • Architecture components
    • Workflow and Interaction Between the Threat Oracle and the Machine Learning Model
    • Contract protection oracle integration
  • 🤖Machine Learning Model
    • Description of the Machine Learning Algorithms Used for Opcode Testing Analysis
    • Data Preprocessing and Feature Extraction from Opcodes
    • Training, Validation, and Testing of the Model
  • 🛡️Protection Oracle
    • Criteria and Metrics for Evaluating Opcode Maliciousness
    • Role and functionality of the protection oracle within the system
    • Integration of the protection oracle with the machine learning model
    • Response mechanisms when malicious opcodes are detected
    • Webapp protection/monitoring
  • 🔢Mathematical Formulations
    • Formulas and Algorithms Used in Opcode Analysis and Threat Assessment
      • Mathematical Rationale Behind the Machine Learning Algorithms Employed
    • Theoretical Underpinnings of the System's Decision-Making Process
    • Presentation of the System's Performance in Detecting Malicious Opcodes
  • 🛠️Tools
    • Pioneering Cybersecurity Tools Powered by AI for Web 3.0
  • ✅Results & conclusions
    • Summary of the Key Findings and System Capabilities
    • Future Directions for Research and System Enhancement
  • 📚References
    • Comprehensive list of academic and technical references supporting the research
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Machine Learning Model

Training, Validation, and Testing of the Model

  • Training: The model is trained using a dataset of contracts with known outcomes (malicious or benign). This phase involves adjusting the model's parameters to minimize error and improve predictive accuracy. (Forta Dataset)

Current results:

Precision: 63% Recall: 79% F1-Score: 70%

  • Validation: A separate dataset is used for validation. Techniques like cross-validation help in tuning the model and selecting the best version to prevent overfitting or underfitting.

  • Testing: The final step involves evaluating the model's performance on a test dataset that it has never seen before. This provides an unbiased assessment of its predictive capabilities.

PreviousData Preprocessing and Feature Extraction from OpcodesNextCriteria and Metrics for Evaluating Opcode Maliciousness

Last updated 1 year ago

🤖